Scotland could face punishment after hinting at World Cup legal action

Scotland could face punishment for theirremarks and behaviors after hinting at legal action when their World Cup match against Japan was under threat of cancellation.
World Rugby has confirmed it will convene a hearing about its own disputes questionnaire, in light of Scotland Rugby Union (SRU) chief executive Mark Dodsons remarks a week.
World Cup organisers managed to stage the match, which ended for the Scots, although dodson hit out at World Rugbys plans to cancel the final Pool A battle of Scotland on Sunday due to Typhoon Hagibis with Japan.
In the days leading up to that clash but Scotland can face sanction for their behavior.
There are championship rules. We are very careful that people behave appropriately, explained World Rugby principal operating officer Alan Gilpin.
We have referred to the independent disputes committee that the remarks and behaviours from the Scottish Rugby Union.
On that basis it is probably inappropriate to comment any further.
Dodson refused to rule out taking legal action – when the game had not gone – during an snap media conference on Friday
Asked if further legal action might be a potential step in the event the game has been scrapped, Dodson said:I believe our view is that we have to reflect on that thing at that moment.
That is really a glorious, world-class sporting occasion. We dont need to be the people. But we also dont need to be this collateral damage.
And thats why we chose the legal path. It was only to say we have had another opinion, two different opinions, one by the QC that battles that rigidity over scheduling.
With the assembly in Kamaishi on Sunday of Namibia and Canada falling foul of Japans largest storm since 1958 typhoon Hagibis pushed the cancellation of New Zealands clash with Italy and England match against France on Saturday.
Rugby World Cup rules state that any game cannot be staged on a different moment.
Scotland felt these regulations were available to challenge because offorce majeure measures, together with Dodson repeatedly demanding acommon sense approach.
Gilpin insisted that appropriate tournament rules had been followed through the typhoon.
We were very clear with everybody before the tournament about the detailed contingency plans in place but also tournament rules about how contingency plans might be executed, said Gilpin.
Tournament rules for Rugby World Cup define that for your pool period any match not completed on the day scheduled will likely probably be not moved to another day. This is evident from the championship rules and not new in Rugby World Cup 2019.
Those contingency plans were in place, including backup venues. However, the rules do not allow for postponements to be changed in pool games.
What became apparent was that the unbelievable size of the typhoon, along with it being 1,400km wide just three match places were out of this typhoons path.
Were not able to execute contingency plans that would deal with all matches and teams fairly and consistently.
Wed just change those rules if we can take care of all teams fairly and consistently. But we could not.
So that led to this challenging choice to cancel two matches on Saturday.
For your four matches on Sunday, we know that the typhoon is anticipated to have passed. But we knew that the match Kamaishi was at the most danger.
Unfortunately that meant we could not play the match.
We did have contingency venue plans for the other few games on the Sunday, but they were always dependent on damaged a result of the typhoon.
Pleasingly of class we played those three games as scheduled. We were consistent with everything laid out prior to the tournament.
While we had appropriate discussions with several marriages, no conclusions were based on stress from some particular unions.
And it is also very important to clarify that we did not have those talks with Ireland.

Read more here:

Comments are closed.